7.   PILOT'S FLIGHT REPORT

By Virgil I. Grissom, Astronaut, NASA Manned Spacecraft Center.  



Introduction

The second Mercury manned flight was made on July 21, 1961. The flight plan provided a ballistic trajectory having a maximum altitude of 103 nautical miles, a range of 263 nautical miles, and a 5-minute period of weightlessness.

The following is a chronological report on the pilot's activities prior to, during, and after the flight.




Preflight

The preflight period is composed of two distinct areas. The first is the training that has been in progress for the past 2 ½ years and which is still in progress. The second area, and the one that assumes the most importance as launch date approaches, is the participation in the day-to-day engineering and testing that applies directly to the spacecraft that is to be flown.

Over the past 2 years, a great deal of information has been published about the astronaut training program and the program has been previously described in reference 1. In the present paper, I intend to comment on only three trainers which I feel have been of the greatest value in preparing me for this flight.

The first trainer that has proven most valuable is the Mercury procedures trainer which is a fixed-based computer-operated flight simulator. There are two of these trainers (fig. 7-1), one at the NASA Langley Air Force Base, Va., and one at the Mercury Control Center, Cape Canaveral, Fla. These procedures trainers have been used continuously throughout the program to learn the system operations, to learn emergency operating techniques during system malfunctions, to learn control techniques, and to develop operational procedures between pilot and ground personnel.



Procedures Trainer

Figure 7-1.   Procedures trainer.



During the period preceding the launch, the trainers were used to finalize the flight plan and to gain a high degree of proficiency in flying the mission profile (fig. 7-2). First, the systems to be checked specifically by the pilot were to be determined. These were to be the manual proportional control system; the rate command control system; attitude control with instruments as a reference; attitude control with the earth-sky horizon as a reference; the UHF, HF, and emergency voice communications systems; and the manual retrofire override. The procedures trainer was then used to establish an orderly sequence of accomplishing these tasks. The pilot functions were tried and modified a great number of times before a satisfactory sequence was determined. After the flight plan was established, it was practiced until each phase and time was memorized. During this phase of training, there was a tendency to add more tasks to the mission flight plan as proficiency was gained. Even though the MR-4 flight plan (table 7-I) contained less pilot functions than the MR-3 flight plan, I found that the view out the window, which cannot be simulated, distracted me from the less important tasks and often caused me to fall behind the planned program. The only time this distraction concerned me was prior to retrofire; at other times, I felt that looking out the window was of greater importance than some of the planned menial tasks. In spite of the pleasant distraction, all tasks were accomplished with the exception of visual control of retrofire.



Chart of Mission Profile

Figure 7-2.   Mission Profile.



The second trainer that was of great value and one that I wish had been more readily available prior to launch was the air-lubricated free-attitude (ALFA) trainer at the NASA-Langley Air Force Base, Va. (fig. 7-3). This trainer provided the only training in visual control of the spacecraft. I had intended to use the earth-sky horizon as my primary means of attitude control and had spent a number of hours on the ALFA trainer practicing retrofire using the horizon as a reference. Because of the rush of events at Cape Canaveral during the 2 weeks prior to launch, I was unable to use this trainer. I felt this probably had some bearing on my instinctive switch to instruments for retrofire during the flight, instead of using the horizon as a reference.



ALFA Trainer

Figure 7-3.   ALFA trainer.



The third training device that was of great value was the Johnsville human centrifuge. With this device, we learned to control the spacecraft during the accelerations imposed by launch and reentry and learned muscle control to aid blood circulation and respiration in the acceleration environment. The acceleration buildup during the flight was considerably smoother than that experienced on the centrifuge and probably for this reason and for obvious psychological reasons, the g-forces were much easier to withstand during the flight than during the trainer missions.

One other phenomenon that was experienced on the centrifuge proved to be of great value during the flight. Quite often, as the centrifuge changed rapidly from a high g-level to a low of 1 g level, a false tumbling sensation was encountered. This became a common and expected sensation and when the same thing occured at launch vehicle cutoff, it was in no way disturbing. A quick glance at my instruments convinced me that I, indeed, was not tumbling.

The pilot's confidence comes from all of the foregoing training methods and from many other areas, but the real confidence comes from participation in the day-to-day engineering decisions and testing that occur during the preflight checkout at Cape Canaveral. It was during this time that I learned the particular idiosyncracies of the spacecraft that I was to fly. A great deal of time had already been spent in learning both normal and emergency system operations. But during the testing at the preflight complex and at the launching pad, I learned all the differences between this spacecraft and the simulator that had been used for training. I learned the various noises and vibrations that are connected with the operation of the systems. This was the time that I really began to feel at home in this cockpit. This trainer was very beneficial on launch day because I felt that I knew this spacecraft and what it would do, and having spent so much time in the cockpit I felt it was normal to be there.

As a group, we astronauts feel that after the spacecraft arrives at the Cape, our time is best spent in participating in spacecraft activities. This causes some conflict in training, since predicting the time test runs of the preflight checkouts will start or end is a mystic art that is understood by few and is unreliable at its best. Quite frequently this causes training sessions to be canceled or delayed, but it should be of no great concern since most of the training has been accomplished prior to this time. The use of the trainers during this period is primarily to keep performance at a peak and the time required will vary from pilot to pilot.

At the time the spacecraft is moved from the preflight complex to the launching pad, practically all training stops. From this time on, I was at the pad full time participating in or observing every test that was made on the spacecraft-launch-vehicle combination. Here, I became familiar with the launch procedure and grew to know and respect the launch crew. I gained confidence in their professional approach to and execution of the prelaunch tests.




The Flight

On the day of the flight, I followed the following schedule:



Event
a.m. e.s.t.
Awakened
Breakfast
Physical examination
Sensors attached
Suited up
Suit pressure check
Entered transfer van
Arrived at pad
Manned the spacecraft
Launched
1:10
1:25
1:55
2:25
2:35
3:05
3:30
3:55
3:58
7:20


As can be seen, 6 hours and 10 minutes elapsed from the time I was awakened until launch. This time is approximately evenly divided between activities prior to my reaching the pad and the time I spent at the pad. In this case, we were planning on a launch at 6:00 a.m. e.s.t., but it will probably always be normal to expect some holds that cannot be predicted. While this time element appears to be excessive, we can find no way to reduce it below this minimum at the present. Efforts are still continuing to reduce the precountdown time so that the pilot will not have had an almost full working day prior to lift-off.

After insertion in the spacecraft, the launch countdown proceeded smoothly and on schedule until T-45 minutes when a hold was called to install a misaligned bolt in the egress hatch.

After a hold of 30 minutes, the countdown was resumed and proceeded to T -30 minutes when a brief hold was called to turn off the pad searchlights. By this time, it was daylight; and the lights, which caused interference with launch-vehicle telemetry, were no longer needed.

One more hold was called at T -15 minutes to await better cloud conditions because the long focal length cameras would not have been able to obtain proper coverage through the existing overcast.

After holding for 41 minutes, the count was resumed and proceeded smoothly to lift-off at 7:20 a.m. e.s.t.

The communications and flow of information prior to lift-off were very good. After participating in the prelaunch test and the cancellation 2 days previously, I was very familiar with the countdown and knew exactly what was going on at all times.

As the Blockhouse Capsule Communicator (Cap Com) called ignition, I felt the launch vehicle start to vibrate and could hear the engines start. Just seconds after this, the elapsed-time clock started and the Mercury Control Center Cap Com confirmed lift-off. At that time, I punched the Time Zero Override, started the stopwatch function on the spacecraft clock, and reported that the elapsed-time clock had started.

The powered flight portion of the mission was in general very smooth. A low-order vibration started at approximately T +50 seconds, but it did not develop above a low level and was undetectable after about T +70 seconds. This vibration was in no way disturbing and it did not cause interference in either communications or vision. The magnitude of the accelerations corresponds well to the launch simulations on the centrifuge, but the onset was much smoother.

Communications throughout the powered flight were satisfactory. The VOX (voice operated relay) was used for pilot transmissions instead of the push-to-talk button. The noise level was never high enough at any time to key the transmitter. Each standard report was made on time and there was never any requirement for myself or the Cap Com to repeat any transmission.

Vision out the window was good at all times during launch. As viewed from the pad, the sky was its normal light blue; but as the altitude increased, the sky became darker and darker blue until approximately 2 minutes after lift-off, which corresponds to an altitude of approximately 100,000 feet, the sky rapidly changed to an absolute black. At this time, I saw what appeared to be one rather faint star in the center of the window (fig. 7-4). It was about equal in brightness to Polaris. Later, it was determined that this was the planet Venus whose brightness is equal to a star of magnitude -3.



Charted View of Stars

Figure 7-4.   Approximate view of stars through centerline window.



Launch-engine cutoff was sudden and I could not sense any tail-off of the launch vehicle. I did feel, as I described earlier, a brief tumbling sensation. The firing of the escape-tower clamp ring and escape rocket is quite audible and I could see the escape rocket motor and tower throughout its tail-off burning phase and for what seemed like quite some time after that climbing off to my right. Actually, I think I was still watching the tower at the time the posigrade rockets fired, which occured 10 seconds after cutoff. The tower was still definable as a long, slender object against the black sky at this time.

The posigrade firing is a very audible bang and a definite kick, producing a deceleration of approximately 1 g. Prior to this time, the spacecraft was quite stable with no apparent motion. As the posigrade rockets separated the spacecraft from the launch vehicle, the spacecraft angular motions and angular accelerations were quite apparrent. Spacecraft damping which was to begin immediately after separation was apparently satisfactory, although I cannot really report on the magnitude of any angular rates caused by posigrade firing.

The spacecraft turnaround to retrofire attitude is quite a weird maneuver to ride through. At first, I thought the spacecraft might be tumbling out of control. A quick check of the instruments indicated that turnaround was proceeding much as those experienced on the procedures trainer, with the expection of roll attitude which appeared to be very slow and behind the schedule that I was expecting.

As the turnaround started, I could see a bright shaft of light, similar to the sun shining into a blackened room, start to move from my lower left up across my torso. Even though I knew the window reduces light transmissions equivalent to the earth's atmosphere, I was concerned that it might shine directly into my eyes and blind me. The light moved across my torso and disappeared completely.

A quick look through the periscope after it extended did not provide me with any useful information. I was unable to see land, only clouds and the ocean.

The view through the window became quite spectacular as the horizon came into view. The sight was truly breathtaking. The earth was very bright, the sky was black, and the curvature of the earth was quite prominent. Between the earth and the sky, there was a border which started at the earth as a light blue and became increasingly darker with altitude. There was a transition region between the dark blue and the black sky that is best described as a fuzzy gray area. This is a very narrow band, but there is no sharp transition from blue to black. The whole border appeared to be uniform in height over the approximately 1,000 miles of horizon that was visible to me.

The earth itself was very bright. The only landmark I was able to identify during the first portion of the weightlessness period was the Gulf of Mexico coastline between Apalachicola, Fla., and Mobile, Ala. (fig. 7-5). The cloud coverage was quite extensive and the curvature of this portion of the coast was very difficult to distinguish. The water and land masses were both a hazy blue, with the land being somewhat darker. There was a frontal system south of this area that was clearly defined.



Charted View of Earth

Figure 7-5.   Approximate view of earth through centerline window.



One other section of the Florida coast came into view during the left yaw maneuver, but it was a small section of beach with no identifiable landmarks.

The spacecraft automatic stabilization and control system (ASCS) had made the turnaround maneuver from the position on the launch vehicle to retrofire attitude. The pitch and yaw axes stabilized with only a moderate amount of overshoot as predicted, but the roll attitude was still being programed and was off by approximately 15° when I switched from the autopilot to the manual proportional control system. The switchover occurred 10 seconds later than planned to give the ASCS more time to stabilize the spacecraft. At this point, I realized I would have to hurry my programed pitch, yaw, and roll maneuvers. I tried to hurry the pitch-up maneuver; I controlled the roll attitude back within limits, but the view out the window had distracted me, resulting in an overshoot in pitch. This put me behind in my schedule even more. I hit the planned yaw rate but overshot in yaw attitude again. I realized that my time for control maneuvers was up and I decided at this point to skip the planned roll maneuver, since the roll axis had been exercised during the two previous maneuvers, and go immediately to the next task.

This was the part of the flight to which I had been looking forward. There was a full minute that was programed for observing the earth. My observations during this period have already been reported in this paper, but the control task was quite easy when only the horizon was used as a reference. The task was somewhat complicated during this phase, as a result of lack of yaw reference. This lack was not problem after retrofire when Cape Canaveral came into view. I do not believe yaw attitude will be a problem in orbital flight because there should be ample time to pick adequate checkpoints; even breaks in cloud formations would be sufficient.

The retrosequence started automatically and at the time it started, I was slightly behind schedule. At this point, I was working quite hard to get into a good retrofire attitude so that I could fire the retrorockets manually. I received the countdown to fire from the Mercury Control Center Cap Com and fired the retrorockets manually. The retrorockets, like the escape rocket and posigrades, could be heard quite clearly. The thrust buidup was rapid and smooth. As the first retrorocket fired, I was looking out the window and could see that a definite yaw to the right was starting. I had planned to control the spacecraft attitude during retrofire by using the horizon as a reference; but as soon as the right yaw started, I switched my reference to the flight instruments. I had been using instruments during my retrofire practice for the 2 weeks prior to the launch in the Cape Canaveral procedures trainer since the activity at the Cape prevented the use of the ALFA trainer located at the NASA-Langley Air Force Base, Va. This probably explains the instinctive switch to the flight instruments.

The retrofire difficulty was about equal to the more severe cases that have been presented on the procedures trainer.

Immediately after retrofire, Cape Canaveral came into view. It was quite easy to identify. The Banana and Indian Rivers were easy to distinguish and the white beach all along the coast was quite prominent. The colors that were the most prominent were the blue of the ocean, the brownish-green of the interior, and the white in between, which was obviously the beach and surf. I could see the building area on the Cape Canaveral. I do not recall being able to distinguish individual buildings, but it was obvious that it was an area where buildings and structures had been erected.

Immediately after retrofire, the retrojettison switch was placed in the armed position, and the control mode was switched to the rate command control system. I made a rapid check to ascertain that the system was working in all axes and then I switched from the UHF transmitter to the HF transmitter.

This one attempt to communicate on HF was unsuccessful. At approximately peak altitude, the HF transmitter was turned on and the UHF transmitter was turned off. All three receivers - UHF, HF, and emergency voice - were on continuously. Immediately after I reported switching to HF, the Mercury Control Center started transmitting to me on HF only. I did not receive any transmission during this period. After allowing the HF transmitter approximately 10 seconds to warm up, I transmitted but received no acknowledgement that I was being received. Actually, the Atlantic Ship telemetry vessel located in the landing area and the Grand Bahama Island did receive my HF transmissions. Prior to the flight, both stations had been instructed not to transmit on the assigned frequencies unless they were called by the pilot. After switching back to the UHF transmitter, I received a call on the emergency voice that was loud and clear. UHF communications were satisfactory throughout the flight. I was in continuous contact with some facility at all times, with the exception of a brief period on HF.

Even though all communications equipment operated properly, I felt that I was hurrying all transmissions too much. All of the sights, sounds, and events were of such importance that I felt compelled to talk of everything at once. It was a difficult choice to decide what was the most important to report at any one time. I wanted as much as possible recorded so that I would not have to rely on my memory so much for later reporting.

As previously mentioned, the control mode was switched from manual proportional to rate command immediately after retrofire. The procedures trainer simulation in this system seems to be slightly more difficult than the actual case. I found attitudes were easy to maintain and rates were no problem. The rate command system was much easier to fly than the manual proportional system. The reverse is normally true on the trainer. The sluggish roll system was probably complicating the control task during the manual proportional control phase of the flight, while roll accelerations appeared to be normal on the rate command system.

The rate command control system was used after retrofire and throughout the reentry phase of the flight. At the zero rate command position, the stick was centered. This system had a deadband of ±3 deg/sec. Our experience on the procedures trainer had indicated that this system was more difficult to fly than the manual proportional control system. This was not the case during this flight. Zero rates and flight attitudes were easy to maintain. The records do indicate that an excessive amount of fuel was expended during this period. Approximately 15 percent of the manual fuel supply was used during the 2 minutes the system was operating. A major portion of the 2-minute period was during the reentry when thrusters were operating almost continuously to dampen the reentry oscillations.

The 0.05 g telelight illuminated on schedule and shortly thereafter I reported g's starting to build. I checked the accelerometer and the g-level was something less than 1 g at this time. The next time I reported, I was at 6 g and I continued to report and function throughout the high-g portion of the flight.

The spacecraft rates increased during the reentry, indicating that the spacecraft was oscillating in both yaw and pitch. I made a few control inputs at this time, but I could not see any effects on the rates, so I decided just to ride out the oscillations. The pitch rate needle was oscillating full scale at a rapid rate of ±6 deg/sec during this time and the yaw rate began oscillating full scale slightly later than pitch. At no time were these oscillations noticeable inside the spacecraft.

During this phase of reentry and until main parachute deployment, there is a noticable roar and a mild buffeting of the spacecraft. This is probably the noise of a blunt object moving rapidly through the atmosphere and the buffeting is not distracting nor does it interfere with pilot function.

The drogue parachute deployment is quite visible from inside the spacecraft and the firing of the drogue parachute mortar is clearly audible. The opening shock of the drogue parachute is mild; there is a mild pulsation or breathing of the drogue parachute which can be felt inside the spacecraft.

As the drogue parachute is released, the spacecraft starts to drop at a greater rate. The change in g-field is quite noticeable. Main parachute deployment is visible out the window also. A mild shock is felt as the main parachute deploys in its reefed condition. the complete parachute is visible at this time. As the reefing cutters fire, the parachute deploys to its fully opened condition. Again, a mild shock is felt. About 80 percent of the parachute is visible at this time and it is quite a comforting sight. The spacecraft rotates and swings slowly under the parachute at first; the rates are mild and hardly noticeable.

The spacecraft landing in the water was a mild jolt; not hard enough to cause discomfort or disorientation. The spacecraft recovery section went under the water and I had the feeling that I was on my left side and slightly head down. The window was covered completely with water and there was a disconcerting gurgling noise. A quick check showed no water entering the spacecraft. The spacecraft started to slowly right itself; as soon as I was sure the recovery section was out of the water, I ejected the reserve parachute by actuating the recovery aids switch. The spacecraft then righted itself rapidly.

I felt that I was in good condition at this point and started to prepare myself for egress. I had previously opened the face plate and had disconnected the visor seal hose while descending on the main parachute. The next moves in order were to disconnect the oxygen outlet hose at the helmet, unfasten the helmet from the suit, release the chest strap, release the lap belt and shoulder harness, release the knee straps, disconnect the biomedical sensors, and roll up the neck dam. The neck dam is a rubber diaphragm that is fastened on the exterior of the suit, below the helmet attaching ring. After the helmet is disconnected, the neck dam is rolled around the ring and up around the neck, similar to a turtle-neck sweater. (See fig. 7-6.) This left me connected to the spacecraft at two points, the oxygen inlet hose which I needed for cooling and the helmet communications lead.



Normal and Unrolled Neck Dam Positions

(a) Normal stored position

(b) Unrolled position


Figure 7-6.   Neck dam.



At this time, I turned my attention to the door. First, I released the restraining wires at both ends and tossed them towards my feet. Then I removed the knife from the door and placed it in the survival pack. The next task was to remove the cover and safety pin from the hatch detonator. I felt at this time that everything had gone nearly perfectly and that I would go ahead and mark the switch position chart as had been requested.

After about 3 or 4 minutes, I instructed the heicopter to come on in and hook onto the spacecraft and confirmed the egress procedures with him. I unhooked my oxygen inlet hose and was lying on the couch, waiting for the helicopter's call to blow the hatch. I was lying flat on my back at this time and I had turned my attention to the knife in the survival pack, wondering there might be some way I could carry it out with me as a souvenir. I heard the hatch blow - the noise was a dull thud - and looked up to see blue sky out the hatch and water start to spill over the doorsill. Just a few minutes before, I had gone over the egress procedures in my mind and I reacted instinctively. I lifted the helmet from my head and dropped it, reached for the right side of the instrument panel, and pulled myself through the hatch.

After I was in the water and away from the spacecraft, I noticed a line from the dyemarker can over my shoulder. The spacecraft was obviously sinking and I was concerned that I might be pulled down with it. I freed myself from the line and noticed that I was floating with my shoulders above water.

The helicopter (fig. 7-7) was on top of the spacecraft at this time with all three of its landing gear in the water. I thought the copilot was having difficulty hooking onto the spacecraft and I swam the 4 or 5 feet to give him some help. Actually, he had cut the antennae and hooked the spacecraft in record time.



Helicopter above spacecraft

Figure 7-7.   Helicopter hovering over spacecraft.



The helicopter pulled up and away from me with the spacecraft and I saw the personal sling start down; then the sling was pulled back into the helicopter and it started to move away from me. At this time, I knew a second helicopter had been assigned to pick me up, so I started to swim away from the primary helicopter. I apparently got caught in the rotorwash between the two helicopters because I could not get close to the second helicopter, even though I could see the copilot in the door with a horsecollar swinging in the water. I finally reached the horsecollar and by this time, I was getting quite exhausted. When I first got into the water, I was floating quite high up; I would say my armpits were just about at the water level. But the neck dam was not up tight and I had forgotten to lock the oxygen inlet port; so the air was gradually seeping out of my suit. Probably the most air was going out around the neck dam, but I could see that I was gradually sinking lower and lower in the water and was having a difficult time staying afloat. Before the copilot finally got the horsecollar to me, I was going under water quite often. The mild swells we were having were breaking over my head and I was swallowing some salt water. As I reached the horsecollar, I slipped into it and I knew I had it on backwards (fig. 7-8); but I gave the "up" signal and held on because I knew that I wasn't likely to slip out of the sling. As soon as I got into the helicopter, my first thought was to get alife preserver so that if anything happened to the helicopter, I wouldn't have another ordeal in the water. Shortly after this time, the copilot informed me that the spacecraft had been dropped as a result of an engine malfunction in the primary helicopter.



Pilot Recovery

Figure 7-8.   Helicopter recovering pilot (horsecollar on backwards).






Postflight

The postflight medical examination onboard the carrier was brief and without incident. The loss of the spacecraft was a great blow to me, but I felt that I had completed the flight and recovery with no ill effects.

The postflight medical debriefing at the Grand Bahama Island installation was thorough and complete. The demands on me were not unreasonable.




Conclusions

From the pilot's point of view the conclusions reached from the second U.S. manned suborbital flight are as follows:

(1) The manual proportional control system functioned adequately on this flight. The system is capable of controlling the retrofire accurately and safely. The roll axis is underpowered and causes some difficulty. The rate command functioned very well during this flight. All rates were damped satisfactorily, and it is easy to hold and maintain the attitudes with the rate command system. If the rate of fuel consumption that was experienced on this flight is true in all cases, it would not be advisable to use the rate command system during ordinary orbital flight to control attitudes. It should be used only for retrofire and reentry. The autopilot functioned properly with the possible exception of the 5 seconds of damping immediately after separation. This period is so brief that it was impossible to determine the extent of any damping. The turnaround maneuver in the pitch and yaw axes was approximately as predicted, but the roll axis was slow to respond.

(2) The pilot's best friend on the orbital flight is going to be the window. Out this window, I feel he will be able to ascertain accurately his position at all times. I am sure he will be able to see stars on the dark side and possibly on the daylight side, with a little time to adapt the eyes. The brighter stars and planets will certainly be visible.

(3) Spacecraft rates and oscillations are very easy to ascertain by looking at the horizon and ground checkpoint. I feel that drift rates will be easy to distinguish on an orbital flight when there is time to concentrate on specific points outside the window.

(4) Sounds of pyrotechnics, control nozzles, and control solenoids are one of the pilot's best cues as to what is going on in the spacecraft and in the sequencing. The sounds of posigrades, retrorockets, and mortar firing are so prominent that these become the primary cues that the event has occurred. The spacecraft telelight panel becomes of secondary importance and merely confirms that a sequence has happened on time. The sequence panel's main value is telling the pilot when an event should have occurred and has not.

(5) Vibrations throughout the flight were of a low order and were not disturbing. The buffeting at maximum dynamic pressure and a Mach number of 1 on launch was mild and did not interfere with pilot functions. Communications and vision were satisfactory throughout this period. The mild buffeting on reentry does not interfere with any pilot functions.

(6) Communications throughout the flight were satisfactory. Contact was maintained with some facility at all times. There was never any requirement to repeat a transmission.

(7) During the flight, all spacecraft systems appeared to function properly. There was no requirement to override any system. Every event occurred on time and as planned.




Reference

  1. Slayton, Donald K.: Pilot Training and Preflight Preparation. Proc. Conf. on Results of the First U.S. Manned Suborbital Space Flight, NASA, Nat. Inst. Health, and Nat. Acad. Sci., June 6, 1961, pp. 53-60.


Table 7-I.   Flight Plan.

Time,
min:sec
Event
0:00Lift-off
0:30Systems report
1:00Systems report
1:15Cabin pressure report
1:30Systems report
2:00Systems report
2:23Launch-vehicle engine cutoff
Tower jettison
Retrojettison switch to OFF
2:33Spacecraft separation from launch vehicle
2:38Spacecraft turnaround to flight attitude on autopilot
3:00Transfer of flight control from autopilot to manual proportional control system, and evaluation of system
4:00Spacecraft yawed 45° to left using horizon as attitude reference
5:10Retrograde rockets fired manually
5:35Retrojettison system armed
Transfer of flight control from manual proportional control system to rate command control system
Radio transmitter switched from UHF to HF
6:10Retropackage jettison
6:40Periscope retracts automatically
Spacecraft positioned into reentry attitude
7:00Communications switched back to UHF transmitter
7:46Reentry starts
9:41Drogue parachute deploys
Snorkels open
Emergency rate oxygen flow
10:13Main parachute deployment
15:37Landing





Previous Index