Apollo 11 Lunar Surface Journal

 

Photogrammetric Analysis Of Apollo 11 Imagery:
New site map with improved locations of camera stations, deployed equipment, and boulders

Copyright © 2010 by Vladislav Pustynski
All rights reserved.
Last revised13 April 2010.

 

1. Introduction

During 2009,  I got interested in precise photogrammetry of Apollo photos; and, through several Russian forums, got an opportunity to collaborate with a person nicknamed "N.A.", who was using photogrammetric software ImageModeler to identify and locate several boulders visible in the direction of West Crater in the surface photography.  Actually, ImageModeler is intended for architectural purposes, but it is suited very well for photogrammetry of the Apollo images.  It has a few drawbacks.  For example, it dislikes "flat" photos, where the benchmark points are distributed over a relatively flat surface..  Nonetheless, ImageModeler is excellent software for obtaining very good quantitative results in a simple way.

Figure 3-15 in the Apollo 11 Preliminary Science Report is a map compiled by R.M. Batson and K.B. Larson at the USGS soon after the mission.  The map is dated 11 August 1969.  See, also, a re-drafted, color version by ALSJ Contributor Thomas Schwagmeier.  The methods used by Batson and Larson were necessarily simplicistic but were chosen to allow rapid compliation of a map adequate for the Preliminary Science Report and and for other early studies of the landing site.  They wrote in the Preliminary Science Report:

The surface traverse and sampling activities of the astronauts have been reconstructed from clues provided by the voice transcript, from review and analysis of the lunar television pictures, from analysis of the 16-mm pictures taken with a time-sequence camera mounted in the LM cockpit, and from detailed study of photographs taken with Hasselblad cameras before, during, and after the EVA. The camera stations for Hasselblad survey panoramas taken on the EVA were located by photographic triangulation from mosaics. Horizontal angles between the LM footpads were measured on the photographs as a function of  the known field of view, and the angles were drawn on tracing paper. The paper was then  manipulated over a scale drawing of the LM until the lines intersected the appropriate pads  at the proper place. Once the panorama locations had been determined, azimuths were measured from two or more panoramas to conspicuous features on the surface, and the positions of the features were plotted by triangulation to produce the map of figure 3-15. Individual photographs were located, and their orientations were measured by similar methods, using for control both the LM footpads and other features on the lunar surface that had been located by triangulation from the panoramas.

Because the graphical method by which these data have been obtained is fairly crude, azimuths shown for individual frames may have errors of 3° or more. Positions of most of the camera stations are probably within a 1.5-m circle centered at the point shown. The determinations are sufficiently accurate, however, to provide a useful control net for an overall view of the astronauts' traverse and a starting point  for more rigorous analytical photogrammetric measurements.

A 1978 USGS/Defence Mapping Agency site map may be derived from the "more rigorous analytical photogrammetric measurements" possible in the years after the last of the Apollo lunar landings in 1972.  That map will be analysed at a later date.

2. 2010 Photogrammetric Revisions to the Site Map

Visual study of the 1969 map convinced me that it’s quite schematic and not very precise. Photogrammetry enabled me to improve the location (camera station) and orientation for each image, along with locations for boulders, and the US Flag, TV, LRRR, and PSEP.  As with the work of Batson and Larson, all locations are calculated relative to structures on the LM.  As of 10 April, I had calculated improved locations of 44 camera stations, representative of the 121 photos Neil and Buzz took during the EVA.  Three addition stations corresponding to three images taken out Buzz's window were also used in the photogrammetric analysis, but are not shown in the site map.

31 March 2010 revision of a11psrf3-15

This 10 April 2010 revision of the 1969 Apollo 11 site map is based on 47 photogrammetrically-calculated camera stations.  Three are associated with photographs were taken out the LMP's window after the EVA and are not shown.  Each small red dot represents a location for a camera station, boulder, or piece of deployed equipment.  For each of the panoramas,  from one to four camera locations and orientations were calculated; camera stations in particular panorama which were not calculated retained their original orientation but were plotted at the  new location of the representative members of the pan.  (Click on the image for a larger version.) See, also, an animated comparison between the original map and the revision.  The major difference is that the locations of the LRRR and PSEP and associated camera stations are farther south of the LM in the new map than in the original.


Batson and Larson estimated that camera station locations shown in the original 1969 map were accurate to about 1.5 meters.  Comparing the original map with the revision, we see that there are differences great than 1.5 m. However, in many cases it is really good estimation, especially for camera stations not far from the LM. As for 3 deg azimuth error estimation, in most cases photogrammetric azimuths differ less than 3 deg from initial azimuths. Difference is larger mostly for cameras locations of which differ significantly from the initial estimations.



2.1 Panoramas

The following table lists the panoramas and the representative frames used to get new pan locations


Pan No. and Location
No. of frames
Frame Sequence (AS11-40-)
Frames Calculated
Pan 1, Foot of LM ladder
9
5850-5858
5850
Pan 2, 10m west of ladder foot pad
12
5881, 5882, 5882A, 5883-5891
5886, 5887
Pan 3, 10m north of plus-Y(north) footpad
12
5905-5916
5905, 5907, 5916
Pan 4, 20m southeast of SEQ Bay
12
5930-5941
5930, 5931, 5932, 5936
Pan 5, rim of Little West Crater
8
5954-5961
5960, 5961



While taking a panorama, the astronaut took one frame and then turned about 30 degrees before taking the next frame.  Four of the five pans were taken in clockwise order, with the astronaut turning to his right between frames; only Neil's Little West pan - with the exception of a turn to his right after the first frame - was taken as in counter-clockwise order.

On the rougher terrain visited by the later crews, the astronauts sometimes had difficulty staying on one spot while taking a pan.  Finding a flat place was not any issue at the Apollo 11 site.  In three of the panoramas, we have calculated positions to two, three, or four images.  Except for one displacement of about 1 meters from the others in Pan 3, the the spread of camera stations within each pan is 0.5 meters or less.

2.2 Comments on images and camera stations


5850/59:  The new locations show that Neil moved about 3.9 meters north from the Pan 1 location before he took 5859.

5855/56: A sharp, fresh crater is seen on the righthand edge of 5855 and at the center of 5856.   Photogrammetric analysis confirms that this is the crater identified in a detail from the 8 August 2009 LROC image.  The crater is about 70 meters from the LM.  See, also, a labeled version of a pan Buzz took out his window after the EVA and a similarly-labeled animation made from the three 2009 LROC images of the site.

5859/60/61: As can be seen in a simplified map detail. Neil moved slightly to his left after taking the first of the three frames, then farther left and forward after the second.

5861:  Original map indicates the LM leg should not be in the frame.  New map and acual photo show the leg in the frame.

5866: The bright boulder visible above the MESA and beyond the inside edge of the north strut can also be seen in 5903, the well-known, full-length portrait of Buzz.

5872/73: Original map shows the SWC right of frame center on 5872 and left of center on 5873.  New map and actual photos show SWC left of center in both images.

5872/73: West Crater is near the horizon on the lefthand side of 5872 (detail) and can also be seen in 5873. The landscape is so flat that it is difficult to estimate distances.  As can be seen in a labeled detail from the 12 July LROC image, the southern portion of Little West Crater lies in the same direction as the portion of West Crater visible in these two images.  A detail from 5872 may show Little West, as labeled.  The southern portion of Little West is hiding the lower parts of various boulders located between the two crater.  Work to identify these cases is in progress and may allow delineation of the Little West rim.  See, also, a discussion (below) of a shadowed wall inside the east rim of an old, heavily eroded crater that is visible immediately south of West Crater.

5874/75: The original map shows both the flag amd a rock near the photographer well to the left of the center. New map and actual photos show the flag nearly centered and the rock right of center.

5874/75: These frames include a boulder identifiable in LROC images.

5903: Shows two boulders visible in the LROC images.

5905: Original map shows the flag well the the right of center and indicates that the SWC should be in the frame.  The new map and actual photo show the fag centered and the SWC out of the frame.

5927/28/29:  These three images were shot from the same location.

5948/50: The PSE is actually to the left of center on 5948, not to the right as on the old map. Also, on the original map, the small stones shown around the PSE and LRRR are difficult to identify in the photos;  later I may try to find more precise positions for several stones in this group.

3. Boulders

Boulders - by definition, pieces of rock bigger than 25 cm - are large enough and scarce enough on the lunar surface that a particular example can often be identified in two or more photos taken from different surface locations. In addition, some examples a meter or more in size can be identified in images taken with the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter Camera (LROC), particularly at low solar elevations.  The following illustration shows at the top a portion of the first of three 2009 LROC images.  It was taken at 05:06:36 UTC on 12 July.  The Sun was at an elevation of 8.2 degrees and an azimuth of 270.2.  Resolution in the raw file is 1.14 m/pixel.  The spacecraft was well to the west of the landing site, so the image has been stretched bu 19(?) % to correct for foreshortening.  The image is repeated at the bottom of the figure with fourteen boulders that have been identified in the Hasselblad images marked with green dots ().

Boulders marked on 12 July 2009 LROC image

Portion of the 12 July 2009 LROC image with boulders
visible in multiple Hasselblad images marked with green dots (
).
(Click on the image for a larger version.)

3.1 Boulder "a"

This boulder is situated nearly due south of the LM at the distance of about 110 meters from its center (see map). I calculated its size based on its angular size in 5875 and the distance from the photographer. It is about 2.5 m long and about 0.8 m high.  Its location is accurate to about 3 %, i.e. comparable with the size of the boulder.

Boulder "a" identified in 5875 and 5548

Boulder "a" labeled in 5875 (left),
a view to the south and slightly west past the ladder strut,
and in 5548 (right), a view to the south out Neil's window.
(Click on the image for a larger version.)


3.2 Boulder "b"

This boulder is seen on many photos showing an area NE of the LM and NW of Little West. The boulder is about 70 m from the LM on the rim of a very shallow crater visible in the LROC images and in Hasselblad images taken from the Pan V location on the rim of Little West Crater. The boulder is elongated in the E-W direction and is about 2 m long on that axis.  It is about 0.8 meters tall and appears to have a triangular cross-section on the SW.  It casts a distinct shadow in the first (12 July) LROC image and, in the third (1 October) LROC image, it shines brightly. It's photogrammetrically-determined distance from the camera stations is accurate to about 3 % or 2 meters.


Boulders B and C in 5886 and 5903

Boulders "b" and "c" in 5886 and 5903.  Both give a view to the northeast.
In both, the line-of-sight to boulder "c" passes near the plus-Y (north) footpad.
Boulder "b" is about 70 meters from the LM and "c" about 180 m.
(Click on the image for a larger view.)




Boulders B, C, D variously in 5886 and 5958

(Left) Boulders "b" and "c" in 5886, a view to the northeast taken from within the LM shadow.
Note the triangular shadow on the end of "b", which may be indicative of the
cross section perpendicular to the elongated, east-west axis.
(Right) Boulders "b" and "d" in 5958, a view to the north from the Pan V location on the rim
of Little West Crater.  This image shows the east-west elongation of boulder "b".
(Click on the image for a larger version.)


Boulder "c"

The best view to this boulder is at the upper right in 5886 (above left). According to the LRO images, the distance is ~180 m, so the boulder was almost certainly ejected from West Crater. Photogrammetry gives a distance of ~160 m for a ~15 % error, which is not surprising given the small parallax available from the 5886/5903 pairing.  In the LROC images, there are no other likely candidates at distances of 150 to 200 m, so the identification seems strong.  A boulder closer to the LM and to the right of "c" in the insets above is two times closer and not distinguishible on LRO images. The portion of boulder c visible in 5886 is 1.5 m; the larger lower part of the boulder may be hidden by terraiin along the line of sight.


Boulder D in 5513 and 5869

Boulder "d" as seen in 5513, taken out Buzz's window, and 5869, one of a sequence
Neil took of Buzz's egress. 
(Click on the image for a larger version.)

Boulder "d"

This is a very flat rock - or, perhaps, a close grouping of separate rocks.  It is marginally discernible in the first LRO photo.  It is ~95 m from the LM. It's width is about 1 m; and the height may be 0.5 m. Positioned with an accuracy of ~1 %.


Boulders E1, 2, 3 in 5516


Boulders "e1, "e2, "e3"

During a post-flight press conference, Neil said, "(There were) rocks in a boulder field (that we photographed) out Buzz's  window that were 3 and 4 feet in size.  Very likely pieces of lunar bedrock.   And it would have been very interesting to go over and get some samples of  those.  We have the problem of a 5-year-old boy in a candy store.  There are just too many interesting things to do."  There is a field of stones to the northwest of LM, window pans provide a great view (see 5516_bould.jpg for instance). One of the boulders, e1, is clearly visible in the LRO images. It can also be seen in several EVA photos.  It is ~ 90 m from the LM, is about 2 - 2.5 m in size.  The photogrammetric distance is accurate to 1%.  Two other boulders, e2 and e3, lie is slight depression and can only be seen in photos taken out Buzz's window and from the rim of Little West Crater. Because the reulting parallaxes are small, the photogrammetric ranges of ~95 and 80 meters for e2 and e3, respectively, differ from those derived from plausible locations identified in the July 2009 LROC image by 14 and 10%, respectively.  Both boulders are similar in size to e1.


Portion of July 2009 LRC containing a, b, d, e1, e2, e3

This portion of the July 2009 LROC image contains boulders "a", "b", "d", "e1", "e2", and "e3".
Both copies of the LROC have been stretched horizontally by 19% to correct for foreshortening.
In the labeled version, actual locations of the boulders are marked with green dots ()
and the photogrametrially-determined locations with red dots ().

Boulders between Little West Crater and West Crater

In the up-Sun view toward West Crater that is captured in 5872/73 and some other photos made in the direction of West crater, a number of large boulders stand out because, loking toward the Sun, we are seeing only their deeply-shadowed, down-Sun sides.  All of them are probably ejecta from West Crater. In a detail from 5873 (below) I have divided these boulders into three groups:  t1 to t4 are four boulders closer to the camera than the rest; v1 to v3 are farther away and less pronounced objects; and w1 to w3 are blurry objects that appear to be associated with what turns out to be the shadowed, inner wall inside the east rim of an old, heavily eroded crater.


Boulder groups t, v, w in 5873


Detail from 5873 with labels applied to ten boulders in the general direction
of the south rim of West Crater. Four boulders assigned to the "t" group
 are relatively close to Little West Crater; three boulders assigned to the
"v" group are at intermediate distances; and three boulders assigned to the
"w" group are indistinct and seem to be associated with a dark band
that extends to the right from the south rim of West Crater
(Click on the image for a larger version.)



In the LRO images, t1 - t4 have been identified with boulders at ranges of 130, 135, 120 and 165 meters, respectively. Photogrammetry gives ranges that are systematically lower by 5 - 9 %, but this is certainly due to low parallax. The visible dimensions (width/height) of the boulders are about 1.5/1.2 m (t1), 2.5/1.2 m (t2), 0.5/1.0 m (t3), and 2.3/1.2 m (t4). However, the stones may be larger actually, since we observe only their upper portions visible above the relief. It is interesting to mention that the relief certainly goes up towards West crater, so that these boulders may stand about 5 meters above the level of the LM pads.

The boulders v1-v3 are situated at the range of 325, 215 and 200 meters respectivly, although photogrammetry gives an error from -8% to +7 %. The size cannot be estimated since we see only the tips of these stones. The fartherst one should be quite large, according to LRO photos.

The calcualted distances to boulders w1, w2, and w3 have large uncertainties because of the small range of parallaxes available, but all are more than about 400 meters from the LM.  As noted in the figure caption above, they seem to be associated with a dark band, very likely a shadowed surface sloping down to the west, most likely the inner east wall of a crater or an outer west wall.  In the next figure, lines-of-sight to boulders t1, t2, and t3 are shown because they bracket the lines-of-sight to w1, w2, and w3.

Old, eroded crater immediately south of West, in the July 2009 LROC image


This 12 July 2009 LROC image was taken when the Sun was at an azimuth of 270.2
and an elevation of 8.2 degrees. The center of the old, eroded crater mentioned in
the text above is southwest of West Crater, with the southwest rim of West Crater
more or less overlaying the northeast rim of the old crater. A young crater about the
same size at Little West was puched into the floor of the old crater southeast of its center.

AS11-40-5872 and 73 were taken on 21 July 1969 at about 03:35 UTC when the Sun was at an azimuth of 88.8 and an elevation
of 14.4 degrees.  Because the solar elevation is similar to that in the July LROC image and the two azimuths are nearly opposite, the dark slope associated with boulders w1, w2, and w3 in 5872-3 is expected to be relatively bright in the LROC image.  In the figure above, a bright area which seems to correspond to the west-facing, inner wall of the old crater is outlined.






Journal Home Page Apollo 11 Journal Index