Advanced Design, Fabrication, and Testing
January 3 to January 20, 1966
1966
January 3
An OMSF memorandum spelled out operational constraints for Apollo
experimenters to prevent experiment-generated operational problems. The
author, E. E. Christensen, investigated the area at the request of NASA
Associate Administrator for Manned Space Flight George E. Mueller and
developed some general conclusions, based on experience gained in the
Gemini experiments program.
Christensen said the following items should be considered:
- The experimenter should be required to produce all hardware and
paperwork on schedule or resign himself to the fact that the experiment
would be deferred to a later flight.
- Training hardware should be identical to flight hardware except for
flight certification documentation.
- The experimenter should be informed that control fuel and power
resources are limited aboard the spacecraft and his requirements should
specify minimum usage.
- The experimenter should be informed that recording and telemetry
facilities are definitely limited and he should provide for alternate
modes of data collection.
- The experimenter should be requested to submit, as early as
possible, detailed operational requirements, including timeline data, to
MSC for inclusion in the flight plan and to allow a maximum time for
solution of operational problems.
- The experimenter should indicate both minimum and optimum experiment
data requirements to allow mission planners some latitude in mission
design.
- The experimenter should be informed that every effort would be made
to fly assigned experiments, but that certain prime mission requirements
might be generated in flight and take precedence. In this event NASA
would make every effort to reassign a deleted experiment to a later
mission.
- The experimenter should be informed that flight crew prime mission
time demands can be exacting and that experiments requiring conscious
efforts on the part of the crew may have to be compromised so as not to
interfere with primary mission objectives.
Christensen suggested that NASA Headquarters could assist by providing
guidance to MSC regarding the assignment of experiment priorities on
each mission and the extent of allowable degradation of experimentation.
He indicated that he felt the following experiments appeared to contain
potential operational problems: S5, Synoptic Terrain Photography; M9A,
Human Otolith Function; S14, Frog Otolith Function; S16, Trapped
Particles Asymmetry; S17, X-ray Astronomy; and S18, Micrometeorite
Collection.
Memorandum, Christensen to Director, Apollo Program, "Operational
constraints for Apollo experiments/ experimenters," January 3,
1966.
January 3
MSC directed International Latex Corporation to use the following cross
section of materials in fabricating the A6L thermal meteoroid garment,
outside to inside: One layer of six-ounce Nomex cloth; seven layers of
H.R.C. super-insulation, starting with one-fourth mil aluminized mylar
and alternating with 1.5-mil unwoven dacron spacers; two layers of
seven-ounce neoprene rip stop nylon (one side coated with neoprene).
TWX, Richard S. Johnston, MSC, to International Latex Corporation,
January 3, 1966; TWX, Richard S. Johnston, MSC, to International Latex
Corporation, January 20, 1966.
January 3
Contractor personnel began an exercise to identify problem areas
associated with activity within the LEM. Subjects using pressurized
suits and portable life support systems ran through various cockpit
procedures in the LEM mockup. Evaluations would continue during the week
of January 10, using astronauts. The purpose of the exercise was to
identify and gather data on problem areas in support of the Critical
Design Review scheduled to be held at Grumman in late January.
MSC, "ASPO Weekly Management Report, December 30, 1965-January 6,
1966."
January 3-7
The Preliminary Design Review for the Block II pressure garment assembly
was held at International Latex Corporation.
MSC, "ASPO Weekly Management Report, January 6-13, 1966."
January 3-14
The LEM landing gear subsystem was reviewed during the LEM Critical
Design Review at MSC and Grumman. The review disclosed no major design
inadequacies of the landing gear. The review included: lunar landing
performance, structural and mechanical design, structural and thermal
analysis, overall subsystem test program including results of tests to
date, and conformance of landing gear design to LEM specifications.
MSC, "ASPO Weekly Management Report, January 20-27, 1965."
January 5
The Apollo Joint Operations Group (JOG) was disestablished by its
cochairmen. JOG had been established in February 1964 to exchange up-to-
date status information on operational problems and to provide a means
for their solution.
Subsequent to the establishment of JOG, responsibility for the Panel
Review Board was transferred to the Apollo Program Director, and the
Operations Management Group and Operations Executive Group were
established. Those activities satisfied the requirements of both the
Apollo Program Director and Mission Operations Director and provided the
operational problem status and solution capability.
Letter, from Chairmen, Apollo Joint Operations Group, to Permanent
Membership, Apollo Joint Operations Group, "Disestablishment of
the Apollo Joint Operations Group," sgd. Samuel C. Phillips and E.
E. Christensen, January 5, 1966.
January 6-13
The 500-second limitation for the Block I service propulsion system SPS
engine qualification program was increased to 600 seconds for the last
three altitude qualification tests. The spacecraft 020 SPS mission duty
cycle required a 310-second burn and a 205-second burn. Discussions with
Systems Engineering Division indicated that the long SPS burns were
needed to support a full-duration S-IVB mission and there was little
likelihood the requirement could be modified. The Block II engine
delivery schedules prohibited obtaining a Block II engine in time to
support spacecraft 020.
MSC, "ASPO Weekly Management Report, January 6-13, 1966."
January 6-13
Apparently the only available spacecraft-LEM-adapter SLA thermal coating
material which would meet the emissivity requirements for LEM flights
was 24-carat gold. North American Tulsa, Oklahoma was predicting 18-week
and 10-week schedule slips, respectively, for the first two Block 11
SLAs and a $10-12 million cost impact. A meeting would be held at Tulsa
January 17 between North American, Grumman, and MSC to determine the
course of the action to be taken.
Ibid.
January 7
George M. Low, Deputy Director of MSC, outlined the general purpose and
plans for the Lunar Sample Receiving Laboratory during a telephone
conversation with Oran W. Nicks, NASA Director of Lunar and Planetary
Programs:
- The Laboratory would prepare the sample boxes which would be sent to
the moon on Apollo missions for the collection of samples.
- These boxes with enclosed samples would be returned to the facility
where they could be opened in the desired vacuum environment.
- The facility could provide a capability for low level radiation
counting and other urgent examinations.
- Samples would be prepared in the facility for distribution to
scientists around the country and abroad who would have previously been
selected to conduct analyses.
- The facility would serve as a repository for the sample material,
and its personnel would act as curators for the samples and scientific
data generated.
- A modicum of Laboratory facilities would be available for use by
guest investigators who wished to study samples for special purposes at
MSC.
- The sample facility would incorporate a quarantine section to
properly assay the lunar materials, and to ensure preventing
contamination on earth. In addition, it was probable that astronaut
quarantine accommodations would be an adjunct to the currently conceived
facility.
Memorandum, Director, Lunar and Planetary Programs, to Distr.,
"Telephone Conversation with Mr. George Low on January 7, 1966, re
Lunar Sample Receiving Laboratory," January 10, 1966.
January 8-11
The first fuel cell system test at White Sands Test Facility was
conducted successfully. Primary objectives were: 1 to verify the
capability of the ground support equipment and operational checkout
procedure to start up, operate, and shut down a single fuel cell power
plant; and 2 to evaluate fuel cell operations during cold gimbaling of
the service propulsion engine.
TWX, Martin L. Raines, Manager MSC WSTF, to MSC, "Preliminary
Report, First Fuel Cell System Test at WSTF," January 11, 1966.
January 10
Soviet life-support systems used in Vostok and Voskhod spacecraft
appeared to use a sodium superoxide compound as a source of oxygen, A.
W. Petrocelli, General Dynamics Corporation, told Missiles and
Rockets. Petrocelli estimated the Russians had published three
times more basic research papers than U.S. scientists on these
materials and were continuing efforts to improve life-support systems
by studying compounds such as new superoxides, peroxides, and ozonides.
He also said they were searching for better carbon dioxide
absorbers.
Missiles and Rockets, p. 33, January 10, 1966.
January 13
A decision made at a Program Management Review eliminated the
requirement for a land impact program for the CM to support Block I
flights. Post-abort CM land impact for Saturn IB launches had been
eliminated from Complex 37 by changes to the sequence timers in the
launch escape system abort mode. The Certification Test Specification
and related Certification Test Requirements would reflect the new Block
II land impact requirements.
MSC, "ASPO Weekly Management Report, January 20-27, 1965."
January 13-20
Mission requirements for AS-503 were reviewed to determine if the LEM
test objectives which caused the crew to be in the LEM at high altitudes
(3,704 to 12,964 km [2,000 to 7,000 nm]) could be deleted. The reason
for keeping the crew out of the LEM at those altitudes was the
possibility they might be exposed to a total radiation dose which might
prevent them from flying a later lunar mission.
MSC, "ASPO Weekly Management Report, January 13-20, 1965."
January 13-20
The service propulsion subsystem (SPS) maximum total burn time was set
at 515 sec for Mission AS-502, instead of 385 sec. The higher limit was
expected to be attained due to the Block I testing burn time being
extended to 600 sec. An SPS propellant loading of 16,783 kg (37,000
lbs) and the 515-sec burn limit had been included in the Apollo Mission
Data Specifications, which was in the publication cycle for support of
the AS-502 Reference Trajectory.
Ibid.
January 13-20
The LEM electrical power system use of the primary structure as the
electrical ground return was approved after Grumman presentations were
made to ASPO and Engineering and Development personnel. The
descent-stage batteries would not use a descent-stage structure ground
to preclude current flow through the pyrotechnic interstage nut and
bolt assemblies. The ascent and descent stage batteries would be
grounded to primary structure in the near vicinity of the ascent-stage
batteries. In addition, several selected manually operated solenoids
would ground. All other subsystems would remain grounded to the
"single-point" vehicle ground. This change would be
implemented by Grumman with no cost or schedule impact and would effect
a weight savings of approximately 7.7 kg (17 lbs).
Ibid.
January 13-27
Hamilton Standard Division was directed by Crew Systems Division to use
a 2.27-kg (5-lbs) battery for all flight hardware if the power inputs
indicated that it would meet the four-hr mission. The battery on order
currently weighed 2.44 kg (5.4 lbs). This resulted in an inert weight
saving of l.45 kg (3.2 lbs) and a total saving on the LEM and CSM of
5.44 kg (12 lbs).
MSC, "ASPO Weekly Management Report, January 20-27, 1965."
January 14
The Grumman contract revision, converting the contract to
cost-plus-incentive-fee, was signed. The period of the contract was
extended through December 1969.
"Quarterly Progress Report No. 1," LPR-10-52, p. 2.
January 20
Apollo Mission A-004 was successfully accomplished at White Sands
Missile Range. This was the first flight test utilizing the Apollo Block
I type spacecraft and the sixth and final test of the Apollo CSM
development program at WSMR. Primary test objectives were:
- to demonstrate satisfactory launch escape vehicle performance for an
abort in the power-on, tumbling boundary region; and
- to demonstrate the structural integrity of the launch escape vehicle
airframe for an abort in the power-on, tumbling boundary region. The
Little Joe II launch vehicle boosted the 4,536-kg 5-ton unmanned
spacecraft to a 24-km (15-mi) altitude.
The only significant anomaly recorded was loss of RE telemetry about two
seconds after abort.
TWX, White Sands Missile Range, New Mexico, to Distr., "MSC Apollo
Mission A-004 (LJ II/SC 002) flight status," sgd. John Lobb for
Joseph F. Shea, January 22, 1966; MSC, "ASPO Weekly Management
Report, January 20-27, 1965."