-
Quest for Performance: The Evolution
of Modern Aircraft
-
-
- Part I: THE AGE OF
PROPELLERS
-
-
- Chapter 3: The Lean Years,
1918-26
-
-
- High-Speed Racing
Aircraft
-
-
-
- [72] The national and
international air races helped stimulate and maintain public
interest and support for aviation during the years immediately
following World War I. The races also provided a focus for the
development of new, high-performance aircraft. Many of these
special aircraft were government sponsored. The Army and the Navy
sponsored such developments in the United States, as did the air
forces of France, Great Britain, and Italy in Europe. The most
successful of these aircraft were highly developed forms of the
biplane configuration. Typical of such aircraft is the 1923
Curtiss R2C-I racer shown in figure 3.4. Standing beside the
aircraft is Navy Lieutenant Alford J. Williams who flew it to
first place in the 1923 Pulitzer race. The aircraft is seen to be
extremely clean aerodynamically and had a phenomenally low
zero-lift drag coefficient of 0.0206 (table II). The aircraft achieved a maximum speed of 267
miles per hour with a liquid....
-
-
-
- Figure 3.4 - Curtiss R2C-1
racer; 1923. [NASM]
-
- [73] cooled engine of
about 500 horsepower. Some of the features that accounted for the
low drag coefficient and consequent high speed are the
minimization of the number of wires and struts to support the
wings, the smooth, highly streamlined sernimonocoque wooden
construction of the fuselage (this type of Construction is briefly
described in chapter 2 in connection with the Albatros D-111 fighter), the
all-metal Curtiss Reed propeller, and the very interesting
skin-type radiators that were used to provide heat exchange
surface for the water-cooled engine. The external surfaces of
these radiators, which formed a part of the surface of the wing,
were of corrugated skin with the corrugations aligned with the
direction of air flow. The remainder of the wing surface was
covered with plywood. The Curtiss PW-8 fighter, of which about 30
were produced in the mid-1920's, also employed the skin-type
surface radiator. Although the skin radiators contributed
significantly to obtaining a low drag coefficient, and hence to
improving performance, they were not practical for use on
operational combat aircraft. In addition to being prone to leak as
a result of flexing of the wings, they were extremely vulnerable
to battle damage, which was probably the deciding factor in their
elimination from future combat aircraft.
-
- A number of racing aircraft were developed
that employed the monoplane configuration. Some of these aircraft
had cantilever wings; others employed strut-braced wings; such
advanced concepts as retractable landing gear were sometimes seen.
For one reason or another, however, none of these monoplane racers
was particularly successful. The Dayton Wright RB racer developed
for the 1920 Gordon Bennett race was perhaps one of the most
advanced concepts developed during the entire period. The aircraft
is illustrated in figure 3.5, and some of its characteristics are
given in table
II. The pilot was entirely enclosed
in the fuselage, which was of wooden semimonocoque construction.
The cantilever wing was constructed entirely of wood an employed
leading- and trailing-edge flaps. These flaps in effect provided
variable camber so that the airfoil section could be adjusted to
its optimum shape for both high-speed and low-speed flight. This
extremely advanced feature did not appear on production aircraft
until the development of the jet transport in the 1950's. The
landing gear on the Dayton Wright racer retracted into the
fuselage in very much the same way as that used in later Grumman
fighters of the thirties and forties. The drag coefficient at zero
lift of the Dayton Wright racer was 0.0316 (table II), which is considerably higher than the value of
0.0206 for the Curtiss R2C-1 but very much lower than the value of
0.0496 given in table I for the DH-4. Although highly advanced for its
time, the....
-
-
-
-
- [74] Figure 3.5 - Dayton Wright RB-1 racer;
1920. [NASM]
-
-
- ....Dayton Wright racer was not successful
in the 1920 Gordon Bennett race. The aircraft was somewhat
underpowered and during the race had to withdraw because of a
broken rudder cable. Unfortunately, the type was not further
developed.
-
- Another highly advanced monoplane racer,
developed by the British for the 1925 Schneider trophy race, was
the Supermarine S-4. The Schneider race was an international event
for seaplanes. Shown in figure 3.6, the S-4 is a beautiful, highly
streamlined, cantilever monoplane mounted on twin floats. The
wing, constructed of a wooden framework covered with plywood,
employed flush radiators that, unlike the previously described
Curtiss racer, were not of the skin type. The wings had landing
flaps that could be geared to the ailerons. The rear of the
fuselage was of wooden semimonocoque construction, and the forward
portion containing the engine was of metal. The engine had 12
cylinders arranged in 3 banks of 4. A front view of the engine
gave the appearance of the letter "W"; accordingly, this cylinder
arrangement was referred to as a W-type engine. A glance at the
characteristics of the aircraft contained in table II indicates a drag coefficient of 0.0274, which must
be considered quite low in view of the large amount of surface
area of the exposed twin floats. The wing loading of about 23
pounds per square foot was high for the period and accounts for
the use of the wing trailing-edge flaps. Another important factor
that allowed the use of such a high wing loading was the
relatively long take off...
-
-
-
-
- [75] Figure 3.6 - Supermarine S-4 seaplane racer;
1925. [NASM]
-
-
-
- ...and landing runs possible with the use
of rivers and harbors, as compared with the confined land
airfields of the day. The aircraft was destroyed by wing flutter
before the 1925 Schneider trophy race (ref. 117). According to reference 114, the ailerons on the S-4 were unbalanced, which no
doubt contributed to the onset of wing flutter at the high speeds
of which the aircraft was capable. Flutter and divergence of
cantilever monoplane wings were not understood at that period in
the development of aeronautical technology. Later Supermarine
racers, which were quite successful in subsequent. Schneider
trophy competitions, employed the more predictable wire-braced
monoplane wings. The designer of the Supermarine S-4, R. J.
Mitchell, later designed the famous Spitfire fighter of World War
II. For those familiar with the Spitfire, some resemblance between
the S-4 and the famous fighter can be seen in figure 3.6. The
national and international air races and the aircraft of the early
1920's are described in comprehensive detail by Foxworth in
reference 51.
-
-
-